It would have to include an inordinate number of shoot-yourself-in-the-foot actions for each side. Stupid lies, pointless crackdowns (including a few murders), and half-baked "compromise" proposals on the golpista side; and Chavista melodrama, US/Colombia half-hearted "support", and message disunity on the Zelaya side... I'm thinking that it would be most realistic if neither "side" had effective control over their allies, so I guess the actual players would be Zelaya himself versus the (crooked) Supreme Court ... or army ... because Micheletti seems to have the tactical sense of a rabid echidna.

Obviously, it's hard to get a feeling that this is a game anybody could win, at least that's how it looks until it's over in real life.